Archive for the ‘9001:2015’ Category

I have uploaded a video that was taken when I presented this as a talk at the Sheffex Exhibition in Sheffield back in November 2017. I sincerely hope that most of you won’t have to read it because you will have transitioned or at least are on your way.

However, on top of the certification bodies telling me that at the end of 2017 some 25% hadn’t even started, I am now hearing of companies that are in that position plus certification bodies are running out of dates and auditors. You will see a brief summary of the benefits of 9001 but, as they didn’t start the recording at the start, you need to know that the three management styles I refer to at the beginning are:

headless chickens
blue a***d flies
and busy fools

What follows is a review of the new requirements and then a simple strategy to get you upgraded to the new 2015 version. Along the way you may also get the feeling that the technical gremlins were out in force as well – and you’d be right 🙂

Be good to hear feedback from as to your experience of the transition where you work and remember that there is more useful information at the iso 9001 support centre.

 

canstockphoto43475088Reviewing how certain sites are coping with the new ‘2015’ format for internal audits has occasionally flagged up some interesting issues.  Some have taken the ‘interview’ style with top management quite literally and reported them along the lines of ‘I asked/ he said’ which just doesn’t come over well when you read it back. You need to summarise the discussion in a way that allows you to report it in the usual factual way rather than it turning into a play.

Of more importance, you still need the objective evidence. You can’t be asking questions then reporting it back as ‘It was stated that etc’. So, what to look for?

Clearly a major document should be the SWOT analysis for the Context of the Organisation. I covered this in a video on a recent post. Also you would expect to see some document that has the needs and requirements of interested parties and the recent reviews and actions if necessary. When you come onto Leadership itself ask them to explain using document that already exist – objectives, policy, critical support process risk review etc.

The need for objective evidence is still their whatever the audit. More helpful tips and support as always can be found at the ISO 9001 Support Centre. Just click through.

It is a very common occurrence when I go on site to conduct my Competent Auditor session that I get asked, “Well that’s OK, but what does an audit look like and what questions should I ask?” Taking that on board, my colleague Amanda and I are putting this video out to see what reaction it gets. Would it help you, your colleagues or your clients get a clearer picture of how they should go about an audit and how to handle the responses?

It is only the trailer as the full video lasts around 12 minutes which starts with a good audit then follows with the three reasons it fails – system inadequate, disregarded or needed

Please leave your comment below and I’ll send the full version to those of you who offer the most constructive feedback. PLEASE don’t get hung up on the actual content and interpretation as we all know each of us will probably approach it in our one unique way 🙂

Remember we are always here to help and support you in your 9001 work. See for yourself by clicking through to the 9001 Support Centre.

Delighted to announce that I have uploaded six new videos that take you on a gentle stroll through the new standard as part of the series “Amanda Asks About Auditing”. We literally flip through the standard as I explain what’s different and where some of the existing items from 9001:2008 have been relocated.

Here’s a quick trailer so you can see what I mean and get a feel as to how we cover it all. It’s quite funky as well!

You can check out the full series here where you will also catch a glimpse in the VIP area of another video idea that we are working on.

Be great to hear what you think when you’ve had chance to watch it.

 

 

As I was about to start a Management Review session for a client the MD put his head round the door and stunned everybody by asking “Do you need me in this meeting”. This was before the new standard was published so it brought a smile to my face as I knew what changes were afoot. Changes that you, like me, doubtless welcomed as being a step in the right direction.

image

Once we had all got sight of the new standard, most of us out there advising small SMEs began to wonder how MDs like my friend would cope with their new responsibilities. No longer could they simply declare, “If it’s quality then you need to talk to my quality man”.

The new section on Leadership is cleverly written to clearly differentiate between those duties the MD has to take on board and those he may delegate. However, if he has distanced himself in the past then doubtless many QA people will be giving him a crash course an all things 9001.

The changes will not affect those business where the workload is shared and the team addresses the relevant requirements of the standard knowing the boss had his finger on the pulse and is also chipping in with his contribution. However, they might be in the minority.

How do you you see this panning out where you work or with your clients? Will it also be the case that quality managers and indeed consultants will be excluded from an audit on the basis that the MD should be competent enough to hold a discussion by himself with the auditor?

Why not share your thoughts below.

ShredderIf you already have a system in place you are doubtless pondering as you look towards the 2015 version whether to bang not only the manual but the mandatory six through the jaws of your shredder as well. (Yes, I know Preventive Action goes anyway but let’s run with it yeah)

The likelihood as I see it, having talked to my sites, is that they will be retained and the temptation to run amok resisted. It’s a bit like some of us now being allowed to get our hands our pension pot to do with as with please isn’t it. You so want to but you hold back.

The manual if written properly (i.e. in say 8 – 10 pages max) is a good marketing tool and the procedures are useful support for those getting there heads round the requirements in QA. However, what to do if you are installing your system?

I think that really depends on the skills and knowledge of the team (yeah, no management representative either doing all the work) who will look after these processes. In my opinion, if they know them inside out then there would appear to be no need to burden them with procedures provided adequate records are being retained to evidence control of each process. However, if they are lacking experience, there is no doubt that there is a good case for writing them. As with all parts of the standard – if not having a procedure risks the process falling over, then you need one.

I have to get my head round how to upgrade the 9001 Training Guides to accommodate the extra requirements and the general move-around of existing procedures so by all means let me know what you would like to see and in what format.  The current version for 2008 are here if you’ve never seen them and would like help with that version.